Remind me again how the Rethuglicans have been anointed as the fiscally responsible party? Oh, yeah, by lying, repeatedly.
WSJ.com - U.S. Annual War Spending Grows
As the U.S. enters its fourth year in Iraq this month, the annual cost of military operations is growing -- even as the Pentagon assumes the number of troops there will shrink.Monthly expenditures are running at $5.9 billion; the U.S. commitment in Afghanistan adds roughly another $1 billion. Taken together, annual spending for the two wars will reach $117.6 billion for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30 -- 18% above funding for the prior 12 months.
That escalation reflects the fact that America's military today is a higher-cost war machine than the one that fought in Vietnam decades ago. But it has also produced bipartisan concern in Congress that “emergency spending” for Iraq has become a way for the Pentagon to meet other needs.
War costs are rising despite Pentagon estimates of lower personnel costs: $2.6 billion for 2006, or 14% less than in 2005. Offsetting that decline is an increased request for procurement of new equipment: $25.7 billion in 2006, up from the $18.8 billion Congress provided in 2005. And year-by-year comparisons show that appropriations for operations and maintenance spending for the Army and Marines are rising by better than 30%.
Higher fuel prices are a factor. In addition, the Army must hire more contractors for logistical chores previously handled by National Guard forces, who have returned home after their mobilization has run its course. “They don't have enough people,” said Rep. John Murtha, a Pennsylvania Democrat.
...Already, $50 billion in war-related emergency spending has been approved for 2006 as part of a “bridge fund” added to the annual defense-appropriations bill in December. When the new request is added, that brings the total to $117.6 billion for 2006, compared with about $99.8 billion in 2005.
The process can be difficult to follow. Congress, at the request of the White House, continues to fund the war incrementally as an “emergency.” That places spending outside the customary spending ceilings that apply to annual appropriations to run the government.
...Typically a “bridge fund” is approved as an addendum to the regular Pentagon budget in the fall. This is followed by a spring supplemental-spending bill, such as the one now in the House...
Adding to confusion is the changing nomenclature for various accounts. For example, the “Iraq Freedom Fund” was prominent early during the war, but has seemed to fade as the money is reallocated to operations accounts. But when set out in order, the four most recent bills -- two for 2005, two for 2006 -- provide a picture of what the annual costs have become on a year-by-year basis.
The Army's operations and maintenance budget, the largest of the services for the war, illustrates these changes. Total appropriations for Army O&M were $30.5 billion in 2005, but the number is expected to rise to $39.7 billion this year. And as much as $1.75 billion has been budgeted for the rest of the year to pay contractors for logistical support work.
Yeah, slick. Less personnel, more equipment. Somebody is making out like a robber baron. Except since our national budget is operating at such an incredible deficit, this is all borrowed money.
Tags: Iraq, /Worst_President
