Fact-free editorials like this are why I stopped reading the WSJ’s opinion pages. Never even open them anymore to scan a headline. I don’t mind reading opinions that don’t conform to mine, in fact, I like shaking my head in befuddlement of other’s wrong thinking or willful misinterpretation of facts. However, reading the WSJ editorial pages is just a waste of time.
Observe:
Trashing Petraeus - WSJ.com:
Important as was yesterday’s appearance before Congress by General David Petraeus, the events leading up to his testimony may have been more significant. Members of the Democratic leadership and their supporters have now normalized the practice of accusing their opponents of lying. If other members of the Democratic Party don’t move quickly to repudiate this turn, the ability of the U.S. political system to function will be impaired in a way no one would wish for.
Well, with one exception. MoveOn.org, the Democratic activist group, bought space in the New York Times yesterday to accuse General Petraeus of “cooking the books for the White House.” The ad transmutes the general’s name into “General Betray Us.”
“Betrayal,” as every military officer knows, is a word that through the history of their profession bears the stain of acts that are both dishonorable and unforgivable. That is to say, MoveOn.org didn’t stumble upon this word; it was chosen with specific intent, to convey the most serious accusation possible against General Petraeus, that his word is false, that he is a liar and that he is willing to betray his country. The next and obvious word to which this equation with betrayal leads is treason. That it is merely insinuated makes it worse.
MoveOn.org calls itself a “progressive” political group, but it is in fact drawn from the hard left of American politics and a pedigree that sees politics as not so much an ongoing struggle but a final competition. Their Web-based group is new to the political scene, but its politics are not so new. More surprising and troubling are the formerly liberal institutions and politicians who now share this political ethos.
… blah blah blah Can this really be the new standard of political rhetoric across the Democratic Party? There was a time when the party’s institutional elites, such as the Times, would have pulled it back from reducing politics to all or nothing. They would have blown the whistle on such accusations. Now they are leading the charge.
Under these new terms, public policy is no longer subject to debate, discussion and disagreement over competing views and interpretations. Instead, the opposition is reduced to the status of liar. Now the opposition is not merely wrong, but lacks legitimacy and political standing. The goal here is not to debate, but to destroy.
Today General Petraeus testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Its Democratic Members include Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Barbara Boxer and Jim Webb. This would be the appropriate setting to apologize to General Petraeus for the MoveOn.org ad. Or let it stand.
Right, because the Republicans are so gentile and dainty in comparison.
Technorati Tags: liars, moralizing_blowhards
I was relieved someone is saying something, you, and it's a cold-headed statement. The parents should have give the guy a name such as Petrius or Peter. I'm not saying he asked for it. The rhyme was inevitable, as Billy
Jean now would make M.Jackson's fans ponder.
All I could think of was the coincidence of blogs/newspeople recommended by the W.Post be extremely biased. Yesterday was my stay-away day and today I have no idea what the General will reveal or revealed.
Can I say I vote Democrat and am for peace?