House Votes to Repeal Breaks for Big Oil

| 1 TrackBack
Do Not Oil Probe Shaft

Come on now, why did the oil corporations need government subsidy in the first place? Especially in today's deficit economy, corporations shouldn't receive welfare. The oil companies all reported record profits last quarter (and the quarter before that, and before that, etc.), in fact, the most profitable quarter ever. Why throw bad money after bad?

The House of Representatives voted to repeal $18 billion of tax breaks for oil and gas producers, and to use the savings to finance tax incentives for wind-power projects, solar panels and more energy-efficient cars.

The bill, which passed by 236-182, faces long odds amid opposition in the Senate and a White House veto threat. But it allowed House Democrats to promote renewable energy as an alternative to high-priced oil, and to take aim at the oil industry, which is in the midst of a profit boom as prices keep rising.

"We have the opportunity to invest in clean, renewable energy and energy efficiency, and grow our economy, creating new jobs," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.)

Republican opponents of the bill said they supported extending tax credits for renewable-energy investments that expire at the end of 2008. But they complained that taking away tax breaks for oil companies would drive production overseas to less stable countries, and make it harder for U.S. companies to compete in a global economy.

[From House Votes to Repeal Breaks for Big Oil]

The Senate should pass this too, but odds are, they won't. Dick Cheney is frantically speed-dialing all the corporate-friendly Democrats.

Oil and gas companies would lose some $13.6 billion in tax breaks granted in 2004 for domestically produced goods. Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp., ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell PLC and BP PLC would lose the tax breaks entirely. The deduction would be frozen at 6% for smaller oil and gas companies. That deduction had been scheduled to jump to 9% in 2010.

Oil companies would also lose another $4.1 billion under provisions that provide less-favorable tax treatment for certain kinds of foreign income.
Here's where part of the money would go:
Consumers would gain new tax breaks for buying plug-in hybrid cars.

1 TrackBack

Gas Tax Redux from B12 Solipsism on April 30, 2008 11:36 PM

If even Tom Friedman can see the faulty reasoning in the gas holiday proposal , yadda yadda… The McCain-Clinton gas holiday proposal is a perfect example of what energy expert Peter Schwartz of Global Business Network describes as the true American ene... Read More

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Seth A. published on March 4, 2008 9:49 AM.

links for 2008-03-04 was the previous entry in this blog.

Carl Zeiss sculpture is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.37